Artificial intelligence is increasingly shaping how humanitarian decisions are made, from processing asylum claims to determining who receives aid. In systems already structured around definitions of vulnerability, AI may not just accelerate decisions, but reshape how need is understood and prioritized. While these tools are often introduced in the name of efficiency, what risks being lost is nuance, the lived realities and context that do not fit neatly into predefined categories. Bioethics demands harder questions: as decision making becomes more data driven, who is accountable for what is overlooked, and who gets left behind? Read more here.